- Norsk bokmål
- Simple English
- Српски / srpski
|possibly depicting Turan, or perhaps one of the Lasas ( )|
|Abode||Velch, Northern Latium Italy|
|Symbol||Dove, Swan, and anything relating to Beauty.|
Turan was the Etruscan goddess of love, fertility and vitality and patroness of the city of Velch .
Depiction [ edit ]
In art, Turan was usually depicted as a young winged girl.  Turan appears in toilette scenes of Etruscan bronze mirrors. She is richly robed and jeweled in early and late depictions, but appears nude under the influence of Hellenistic art in the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE.  She is paired with her young lover Atunis ( Adonis ) and figures in the episode of the Judgement of Paris .
Attributes [ edit ]
Turan was commonly associated with birds such as the dove , goose and above all the swan ,  Tusna , "the swan of Turan".  Her retinue were called Lasas . Turan may be quite ancient but does not appear on the Piacenza list nor in Martianus list of Etruscan deities. The Etruscan month of July was named after her, although we only know the Latin word for it, Traneus . 
Etymology [ edit ]
Turan was seen as the equivalent to the Roman Venus and the Greek Aphrodite . Her name is the pre-Hellenic root of "Turannos" (absolute ruler, see tyrant ),  so Turan can be viewed as “Mistress".
Turan had a sanctuary in the Greek-influenced Gravisca , the port for Tarquinia , where votive gifts inscribed with her name have been found. One inscription calls her Turan ati , "Mother Turan" which has been interpreted as connecting her to Venus Genetrix , Venus the mother of Aeneas and progenitor of the Julio-Claudian lineage.
Legacy [ edit ]
Turan is one of the few Etruscan goddesses who has survived into Italian folklore from Romagna . Called "Turanna", she is said to be a fairy, a spirit of love and happiness, who helps lovers. 
Notes [ edit ]
- ^ e.g. N. H. Ramage and A. Ramage, Roman Art , Upper Saddle River, 1996: fig. 1.39
- ^ Larissa Bonfante and Judith Swaddling, Etruscan Myths (Series The Legendary Past) British Museum/University of Texas, 2006:76–77 et passim .
- ^ de Grummond, Etruscan Myth, Sacred History and Legend , page 85
- ^ Jaan Puhvel, "The Origin of Etruscan tusna ('Swan')" The American Journal of Philology 105 .2 (Summer 1984:209–212).
- ^ de Grummond, Etruscan Myth, Sacred History and Legend , page 86
- ^ Raymond Bloch, "The Etruscans", page 153.
- ^ Aa.Vv, Studi romagnoli , Volume 55, Società di studi romagnoli, Cesena 2004, pp. 212–213 (Italian).
External links [ edit ]
- Etruscan goddesses
- Fertility goddesses
- Love and lust goddesses
- Articles with short description
- Short description is different from Wikidata
- Articles having same image on Wikidata and Wikipedia
- Commons category link is on Wikidata
- Articles with VIAF identifiers
- Articles with WorldCat-VIAF identifiers
- Articles with SUDOC identifiers
- Entertainment & Pop Culture
- Geography & Travel
- Health & Medicine
- Lifestyles & Social Issues
- Philosophy & Religion
- Politics, Law & Government
- Sports & Recreation
- Visual Arts
- World History
- On This Day in History
- Top Questions
- Week In Review
- Image Galleries
- One Good Fact
- Britannica Classics Check out these retro videos from Encyclopedia Britannica’s archives.
- #WTFact Videos In #WTFact Britannica shares some of the most bizarre facts we can find.
- This Time in History In these videos, find out what happened this month (or any month!) in history.
- Demystified Videos In Demystified, Britannica has all the answers to your burning questions.
- Britannica Explains In these videos, Britannica explains a variety of topics and answers frequently asked questions.
- Student Portal Britannica is the ultimate student resource for key school subjects like history, government, literature, and more.
- COVID-19 Portal While this global health crisis continues to evolve, it can be useful to look to past pandemics to better understand how to respond today.
- 100 Women Britannica celebrates the centennial of the Nineteenth Amendment, highlighting suffragists and history-making politicians.
- Britannica Beyond We’ve created a new place where questions are at the center of learning. Go ahead. Ask. We won’t mind.
- Saving Earth Britannica Presents Earth’s To-Do List for the 21st Century. Learn about the major environmental problems facing our planet and what can be done about them!
- SpaceNext50 Britannica presents SpaceNext50, From the race to the Moon to space stewardship, we explore a wide range of subjects that feed our curiosity about space!
- Related Content
- More Articles On This Topic
- Article History
Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.
Turan Plain , Uzbek Turon , extensive lowland in southwestern Kazakhstan and northwestern Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan . It is bounded by the Saryarqa (Kazakh uplands) in the north, the outliers of the Tien Shan , Pamir, and Alay mountains in the east, the Kopet-Dag Range in the south, and the Caspian Sea in the west. It is traversed by the lower courses of the Syr Darya and Amu Darya , both of which drain into the Aral Sea . The arid plain encompasses two deserts, separated by the valley of the Amu Darya: the Karakum and the Kyzylkum . The deserts comprise fine-grained sedimentary rocks overlain by extensive sand dunes and sand sheets. Vegetation is sparse, comprising xerophytic (drought-resistant) scrubs and short grasses. There are a number of hills up to 3,300 feet (1,000 metres) in elevation, as well as several depressions below sea level .
What does Turan mean?
Definitions for turan tu·ran, here are all the possible meanings and translations of the word turan ., did you actually mean turin or tirana , wiktionary (0.00 / 0 votes) rate this definition:.
A nomadic people of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan.
Any of the languages of these people.
Freebase (1.00 / 1 vote) Rate this definition:
Tūrān is the Persian name for a region around Central Asia, literally meaning "the land of the Tur". As described below, the original Turanians are an Iranian tribe of the Avestan age. As a people the "Turanian" are one of the two Iranian peoples both descending from the Persian Fereydun but with different domains and often at war with each other. In fact according to the Shahnameh's account, at least 1,500 years later after the Avesta, the nomadic tribes who inhabited these lands were ruled by Tūr, who was the emperor Fereydun's elder son. The association with Turks is also primarily based on the Shahnameh's geographical account where Turkification of Central Asia was partially completed during that time. Tur/Turaj is the son of emperor Fereydun in ancient Iranian mythology. In the Shahnameh, he is identified with the Turks although culturally, there is no relationship between Turanians of the Shahnameh and the culture of ancient Turks. In 19th century and early 20th century discourse, now obsolete, Turan was primarily an ideological term designating Altaic and Uralic languages.
Anagrams for Turan »
How to pronounce turan.
Alex US English David US English Mark US English Daniel British Libby British Mia British Karen Australian Hayley Australian Natasha Australian Veena Indian Priya Indian Neerja Indian Zira US English Oliver British Wendy British Fred US English Tessa South African
How to say Turan in sign language?
The numerical value of Turan in Chaldean Numerology is: 9
The numerical value of Turan in Pythagorean Numerology is: 2
Popularity rank by frequency of use
Translations for turan, from our multilingual translation dictionary.
- توران Arabic
- turan Czech
- turan Danish
- turan German
- τουράν Greek
- turan Esperanto
- turan Spanish
- توران Persian
- turan Finnish
- touran French
- Turan Hungarian
- turan Indonesian
- טוראן Hebrew
- トゥラン Japanese
- ಟುರಾನ್ Kannada
- turan Latin
- turan Dutch
- turan Norwegian
- turan Polish
- turan Portuguese
- turan Romanian
- туран Russian
- turan Swedish
- turan Turkish
- turan Vietnamese
- טוראַן Yiddish
Get even more translations for Turan »
Translation, find a translation for the turan definition in other languages:.
Select another language:
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Word of the Day
Would you like us to send you a free new word definition delivered to your inbox daily.
Please enter your email address:
Discuss these Turan definitions with the community:
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe. If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
You need to be logged in to favorite .
Create a new account.
Your name: * Required
Your email address: * Required
Pick a user name: * Required
Username: * Required
Password: * Required
Forgot your password? Retrieve it
Use the citation below to add this definition to your bibliography:.
Style: MLA Chicago APA
"Turan." Definitions.net. STANDS4 LLC, 2023. Web. 25 Jan. 2023. < https://www.definitions.net/definition/Turan >.
Are we missing a good definition for Turan ? Don't keep it to yourself...
Image credit, the web's largest resource for, definitions & translations, a member of the stands4 network, image or illustration of.
Free, no signup required :, add to chrome, add to firefox, are you a words master, having a build with little fat or muscle but with long limbs.
- A. unsealed
- B. ectomorphic
- C. soft-witted
- D. defiant
Nearby & related entries:
Alternative searches for Turan :
- Search for Turan on Amazon
- Search for Turan on Google
Bakhtiyar Hajiyev's health is getting worse - lawyer
Azerbaijani foreign ministry called on the un foundation not to go beyond its mandate, ayhan hajizadeh replied to his american colleague, azerbaijan-armenia: u.s. 'hopes to see' direct dialogue, state department say.
Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) -2023: development prospects
Issues of delimitation of the bottom of the Caspian Sea between Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan discussed
More than 2,000 women called the "Women's Hotline" with a request for help
Egyptian President to visit Azerbaijan
"Big" pardon expected in May - Zahid Oruj
Forecasters predict frosty weather in the capital
Qeydiyyat problemi. Hökumət Bakıya axının qarşısını cərimələrlə almağa çalışır? – Hafiz Həsənov saat 16:00-da Çətin sual qarşısında
Action on the Lachin road - day 45
PPFA and DME report arrests of their activists after march on Shehid Alley
Head of Border Guard Service of Saudi Arabia visited Azerbaijan
Meeting of Foreign Ministers of Azerbaijan and Iran in Tashkent
Azerbaijani army soldier shot himself
U.S. Set To Send Abrams Tanks To Ukraine
Illegitimate decision pursuing a political goal
Afterword to Blinken's call. Human rights or other interests?
Purchase of goods for newly formed polling stations was carried out by proxy company
Serbia Risks EU Path If It Rejects Kosovo Plan, Vucic Says
Sweden’s NATO Bid in Doubt After Erdogan Refuses Support
AZAL does not comment on rumors about the dismissal of the head of this airline J. Askerov
Ukraine purges officials and governors in biggest shakeup of war
"They wanted collapse, but instead they got consolidated power and people in Ukraine" - Vadim Trukhan from Kyiv
We first met at the University of Budapest in September 1930 and immediately discovered our common interest in number theory .
Probably the most important, most enduring and most original of Turán's results are in his power sum method and its applications. I was there when it originated in 1938 . Turán mentioned these problems and told me that they were not only interesting in themselves but their positive solution would have many applications. Their importance first of all is that they lead to interesting deep problems of a completely new type; they have quite unexpectedly surprising consequences in many branches of mathematics - differential equations, numerical algebra, and various branches of function theory.
... investigated the distribution of primes in the reduced residue classes mod k. ... The power sum method proved to be the unique procedure for investigating this problem up to now. Their results in this field were published in nearly 20 papers and were called comparative number theory by the authors.
But not even [ the labour camp ] could stop his mathematical activity. In every situation, making use of the smallest opportunity, he carried on his research without books and journals, missing the company of colleagues, jotting down his ideas and results on scraps of paper. Several of his new ideas, problems and now famous theorems, originate from that period. As G Alexits has written about him: "When the fascist barbarism forced him to pull electric wires on poles he defended himself against the malevolent oppression be dealing with his mathematical ideas. Once he told me: "I got my best ideas while pulling wires, because then I could be alone and nobody noticed that I was thinking."
... in July 1976 , at the meeting on combinatorics at Orsay in Paris, V T Sós ( Mrs Turán ) gave me the terrible news ( which she had known for six years ) that Paul had leukaemia. She told me that I should visit him as soon as possible and that I should be careful in talking to him because he did not know the true nature of his illness. My first reaction was to say that perhaps he should have been told ... She said that Paul loved life too much and with a death sentence hanging over him would not be able to live and work very well. ... I am now fairly sure that her decision was right, since he clearly never tried to find out the true nature of his illness. in fact a few days before his death [ his wife ] and their son George ( also a mathematician ) tried to persuade him to dictate some parts of his book to Halász or Pintz. he refused saying "I will write it when I feel better and stronger". Unfortunately he never had the chance. Fortunately his book was finished by his students G Halász and J Pintz ...
In 1953 the author published a book, A new method of analysis and its applications ... giving a systematic account of his methods for estimating "power sums", which he had developed (1941 - 53) into a versatile and powerful technique with numerous applications to Diophantine approximations, zero-free regions for the Riemann zeta function and the error term in the prime number theorem , and to problems in other parts of classical analysis. As regards the latter, Turán found new approaches to such topics as quasi-analytic classes, Fabry's gap theorem and the theory of lacunary series, amongst others. The book was revised ( with improved estimates ) in a second edition, but this had a limited mathematical audience since it was only available in Chinese. In 1959 Turán embarked on the preparation of a new, greatly expanded version of the book. Constant rewriting became necessary in the light of the new improvements and applications, and, at the time of his death in 1976 , the project had still not been completed to Turán's total satisfaction. The book under review represents the culmination of all this work ...
In the opinion of the reviewer this book renders a great service to mathematicians working in a wide area of classical analysis, particularly analytic number theorists ; Turán's methods are still of great relevance in current research, and it is particularly gratifying to have all this material within the confines of a single volume. The book is a fitting tribute to Turán's remarkable achievements in analysis, and the editors of the manuscript deserve high praise for their efforts in bringing it to publication.
... outstanding in analytic number theory but not a good manager of a department.
I have used the Fejér papers often. Turán's editing was remarkable. He commented on many of the papers, setting them in context and telling what happened to the ideas Fejér introduced.
References ( show )
- P Erdos, Biography in Dictionary of Scientific Biography ( New York 1970 - 1990) . See THIS LINK .
- P Erdős ( ed. ) , Paul Turán, Collected papers of Paul Turán (3 volumes ) ( Budapest, 1990) .
- L Alpár, In memory of Paul Turán, J. Number Theory 13 (3) (1981) , 271 - 278 .
- R Askey, Dedication: remembering Paul Turán, J. Approx. Theory 86 (3) (1996) , 253 - 254 .
- P Bundschuh, Review of Paul Turan's collected papers, Jahresberichte der Deutschen Mathematiker vereinigung 94 (1992) , B 3 - 5 .
- P Erdős, Paul Turán 1910 - 1976 : his work in graph theory, J. Graph Theory 1 (2) (1977) , 97 - 101 .
- P Erdős, Some personal reminiscences of the mathematical work of Paul Turán. Acta Arith. 37 (1980) , 4 - 8 .
- P Erdős, Preface : Personal reminiscences, Studies in pure mathematics ( Basel, 1983) , 11 - 12 .
- P Erdős, Some notes on Turán's mathematical work, P Turán memorial volume, J. Approx. Theory 29 (1) (1980) , 2 - 5 .
- G Halász, Letter to Professor Paul Turán, Studies in pure mathematics ( Basel, 1983) , 13 - 16 .
- G Halász, The number-theoretic work of Paul Turán, Acta Arith. 37 (1980) , 9 - 19 .
- G Halász, Gábor Szegö and Pál Turán ( Hungarian ) , in Gábor Szegö memorial ( Hungarian ) Kunhegyes, 1995 , Mat. Lapok ( N.S. ) 3 (3) (1993) , 33 - 35 .
- List of publications of Paul Turán, J. Number Theory 13 (3) (1981) , 289 - 298 .
- List of works of Paul Turán, Acta Arith. 37 (1980) , 21 - 34 .
- List of publications of Paul Turán, J. Approx. Theory 29 (1) (1980) , 14 - 22 .
- G G Lorentz, The work of P Turán on interpolation and approximation, P Turán memorial volume, J. Approx. Theory 29 (1) (1980) , 6 - 10 .
- J Pintz, On Paul Turán's work in number theory, J. Number Theory 13 (3) (1981) , 279 - 288 .
- A Schinzel, Paul Turán's work in number theory, Topics in classical number theory Vol. I ( Amsterdam-New York, 1984) , 31 - 48 .
- M Simonovits, On Paul Turán's influence on graph theory, J. Graph Theory 1 (2) (1977) , 102 - 116 .
- V T Sós, Turbulent years : Erdős in his correspondence with Turán from 1934 to 1940 , in Paul Erdős and his mathematics I, Budapest, 1999 ( Budapest, 2002) , 85 - 146 .
- P Szüsz, P Turán : reminiscences of his student, P Turán memorial volume, J. Approx. Theory 29 (1) (1980) , 11 - 12 .
- The graph theory bibliography of Paul Turán, J. Graph Theory 1 (2) (1977) , 96 .
Additional Resources ( show )
Other pages about Paul Turán:
- Vera Sós on mathematicians she knew
Other websites about Paul Turán:
- Dictionary of Scientific Biography
- Acta Arithmetica
- Mathematical Genealogy Project
- MathSciNet Author profile
- zbMATH entry
- ERAM Jahrbuch entry
Cross-references ( show )
- Other: 1970 ICM - Nice
40M Turán I
- Post author By brian.gaydos
- Post date March 20, 2021
- 6 Comments on 40M Turán I
Hungary (1941-1945) Medium Tank – 285 Built
In the later part of the interwar period, the Kingdom of Hungary was seeking to improve its lightly armored motorized units. Domestically, Hungary did not have any tank designs available, outside of the lightly armored amphibious V-4 design. This lack of heavier domestic designs led the Hungarian leaders to search for vehicles to import or produce under license from other countries. This search would find its end in Czechoslovakia and lead the Hungarians to the production of the 40M Turán I and its later derivatives. While the design of this tank proved to be lacking in many regards, its production was a real testament to the power of the weakened Hungarian heavy industry.
The use of tanks throughout Europe in the early stages of the Second World War led the Hungarian military leaders to search for tanks to arm their Royal Hungarian Army, known as the Magyar Királyi Honvédség, with. First, a light tank was sought and found in the form of the 38M Toldi I , a modified version of the Stridsvagn L-60 manufactured under license in Hungary. This tank was successful in its early use, but it was clear that a heavier tank would be needed for the future. As such, Hungary looked for a suitable medium tank for the army.
Before looking for designs that could be produced under license, domestic designs were sought. Unfortunately for the Royal Hungarian Army, the only domestic design of the time was the V-4 light tank designed by the engineer Nicholas Struassler (Straussler Miklós), influential armored car designer and future inventor of the flotation screen. This design was well-armed, as it used the same 4 cm gun that would be mounted in the 40M Turán I, but its suspension was unsatisfactory, its drivetrain complex, its climbing ability hampered by the hull’s shape, its center of gravity high, and its turret lacked a machine gun. As such, the Hungarians turned their attention outwards. In 1938, Hungary looked towards their economic partners, Italy and Germany, for licenses to produce their vehicles. Both countries needed their vehicles to fight the Allied powers. Germany’s Panzers were being sold for much more than the Hungarians could afford, whilst Italy’s medium tanks were either inadequate to meet Hungarian standards or delivered to Hungary after the HTI had purchased the license for a Czech design. Hungary also reached out to Sweden’s Landsverk AB to negotiate the license for the Lago (sometimes written LAGO), a development upon the L-60. This development was delayed and negotiations ended in August of 1940.
During relatively minor border skirmishes with Slovakia in 1939, the Royal Hungarian Army had captured and repaired two damaged Škoda LT vz. 35s and were impressed by their design. In the spring of 1940, representatives from Škoda approached the Hungarian Ministry of Defense about selling the Hungarians military equipment. In April, a Hungarian delegation was sent to Pilsen to discuss purchasing Škoda’s designs with its director, Vaclav Fiegleb. The representatives were presented with several designs including the LT vz. 35, the T-21 (a development upon the LT vz. 35 originally known as the Š-II-c) and the ST. vz 39 (originally known as the ČKD V-8-H). While ČKD had originally designed the ST. vz 39, Škoda armed the vehicles and had been responsible for manufacturing 205 tanks to fulfill part of a planned order from the Czechoslovak Army which was never delivered with the German annexation of the country. With the planned order canceled but the manufacturers prepared for production, ČKD allowed the design to be marketed for export and the army officially gave it the ST vz. 39 designation to improve the marketability of the vehicle in exchange for 5% of proceeds from sales. The ST vz. 39 was marketed to countries across Europe and Asia, but little is written regarding Hungary’s interest in the vehicle.
Negotiations to license the design of the T-21 to the Kingdom of Hungary and other countries continued. It is sometimes noted that the Turán was developed from further development of the T-21 called the T-22, but this is incorrect. The T-22 prototype was built from the T-21 at the request of the Wehrmacht in 1940, but the T-21, not the T-22, was the vehicle being demonstrated to Hungary, Romania, and Italy between 1939 and 1941.
In May 1940, a T-21 prototype was demonstrated in Pilsen to a Hungarian commission. The following June and July, two T-21 prototypes were demonstrated and tested by the Hungarians and, in August 1940, an agreement to give Hungary production rights was reached. The Hungarian version was called the 40M Turán medium tank, named after the Asiatic homeland of the Magyar people in Hungarian legend. Later, the Roman numeral I would be added to the end of the name to differentiate the 40M Turán from the later 41M Turán II. These vehicle names were later changed to 40M Turán 40 and 41M Turán 75 (due to their respective main guns’ calibers), but these designations are infrequently used.
Interestingly, the development of the T-21 in Czechoslovakia and Hungary did not stop when the agreement was reached. Instead, both countries agreed to share information while developing the designs in parallel with one another. From the trials and demonstrations of the vehicle, it was decided that the vehicle was a good and reasonably reliable design when crewed by trained men, but that several modifications would be needed before it could see service in the Royal Hungarian Army. Most distinctly, the original two-man turret was replaced with a similarly shaped, but larger three-man design.
Next, the main gun was changed from the original Czech 47 mm A11 to the 40 mm 41M L/51 gun domestically produced by MÁVAG (the Hungarian Royal State Railroads’ Machine Factory) that was used on both the Toldi IIa and V-4 and fired the same ammunition as the Nimród. Oddly, the Hungarians also purchased but never used a license to produce the Czech A17 gun. Due to the change of the main gun, its mount was also modified to handle the new weapon. The machine guns were also changed to Gebauer 8 mm 34/40M machine guns from the Czech Brno ZB30 machine gun originally found on the T-21.
The original engine was replaced with a V8 Z series engine produced by the Weiss Manfréd Steel and Metal Works in Csepel, Hungary (commonly called Manfred Weiss in English sources). The suspension of the Turán remained predominantly unchanged from the T-21, but the wheel below the front idler and raised off the ground was rimmed with aluminum rather than rubber, as on the T-21. A Hungarian R/5a radio was installed in the turret for communication and the rest of the electronics system were changed from Scintall to Bosch designs. All of these changes would take a year to complete and the final prototype was finished on July 8th, 1941.
Early Production and Delays
After the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1918, Hungary was left in a very poor position. Two-thirds of the country lacked electricity and over 1,000,000 adults were illiterate in 1941. However, most importantly for tank production, Hungary had lost most of its industry. The Austro-Hungarian industry had been focused outside of the land that Hungary was apportioned under the Trianon Treaty. By the 1930s, an industrial sector had developed within Hungary, but its size limited its production capability. Most of the industrial power was focused within Budapest, which was not an issue during peacetime, but proved problematic when bombing campaigns were held to weaken the industrial strength of the Axis Powers and when the Red Army captured the city. On top of this, the country was left in poverty and the Pengő, the Hungarian currency, was hyperinflated following World War One
The initial stages of production were found to be very problematic and the production of the first Turáns was seriously delayed. Initially, the Hungarians had to develop a technique to produce thick armor. The industry had previously never made armor thicker than 13 mm and lacked many alloying metals, especially vanadium and nickel. The Diosgyor steelworks was able to develop Mester-type steel that was roughly as effective as the standard armor plating the Hungarians were using but was free of rare nickel. Furthermore, this steel was able to be produced in thicknesses greater than 13 mm but was oddly difficult to produce under 20 mm. The steelworkers at Rába were able to solve this problem with another kind of steel referred to as improved AJAX armor. This steel was as strong as the Mester type but could be made at any thickness. Both armors were hard and offered good protection to impacts but were brittle and had tendencies to spall when penetrated. It is unclear whether the AJAX armor was used in the Turán, but the Mester type was. The next delay to production came when Škoda discovered a new design for cylinder heads that greatly improved the performance of the engine. The Hungarians adopted this technology, but, in doing so, were forced to discard the engine castings they had already made and installed in some early production vehicles.
Testing started on July 22nd, 1941, and immediately showed severe engine problems. The tests were stopped very quickly while these engine issues were resolved. The repairs took until late September. In October, testing recommenced. Between October and December, the Turán prototype had covered 6,000 km in the mountains at the hands of Colonel Tchaikovsky Emanuel. These tests highlighted another glaring issue with the design: the cooling system of the engine was far too weak to keep the engine at a safe operating temperature unless operating in extreme cold. Other mechanical issues found included that the pneumatic system’s pipes were prone to clogging and that the vehicle was prone to becoming stuck in the mud. Lastly, operator error was found to be a large problem while using the double clutch of the transmission. A design office run by a man named Erno Kovacshazy resolved the mechanical issues with nearly 40 modifications made to the vehicle.
These changes were finalized by March 1942. Two months later, in May, the original Turán had traveled over 10,000 km. In June, Weiss Manfréd delivered the first four Turáns with the new cooling system for crew training. It was expected that new problems would be found during the training, but no major mechanical issues were found. As in the testing, the clutches continued to prove difficult for the drivers to use, but little could be done to rectify the issue other than continue training. As the Turán was the most complex tank in Hungarian service, these growing pains were simply par for the course. Around this time, the frontal armor was increased to 50 mm. This increased the weight to 18.2 tonnes and was compensated for with some final changes to the engine to allow the production of 260 hp.
The layout of the 40M Turán was normal by the standards of the time. The rear of the hull contained the engine and transmission of the tank, while the front housed the fighting compartment. The engine compartment was also able to house the main fuel tanks and radiators due to the narrowness of the engine. The outside of the engine compartment was home to multiple intake grilles to cool the engine and several important mounting points.
On the sides of the engine compartment were mounting locations for pioneering tools and tow cables, while the rear housed 2 spare road wheels and 5 smoke grenades. When used properly, these grenades could create a smokescreen 20 m long, 40 m wide, and 80 m tall.
The fighting compartment was separated from the engine compartment by an 8 mm bulkhead and an auxiliary fuel tank. The front of the fighting compartment held two of the five crewmen of the tank, with the driver sitting on the right side, in front of a complex array of levers and pedals, with the secondary driver/machine gunner sitting to his left. The other crewmen, the gunner, loader, and commander, were found in the 3-man turret. The gunner would take the left side, with the loader to his right and the commander behind both of them, under the cupola towards the rear. Each crewmember had his own periscope through which to view the outside. The turret had four lifting hooks mounted on towards the outer corners, from which the turret could be removed from the tank. Ammunition, a medical kit, and an R5/A radio were all kept in the turret, although some ammunition was stored in the hull. The top of the turret also included a small hole, similar to a pistol port, through which signal flags could be flown. Antennas for radio communication could be found on the hull next to the driver’s position and the rear of the turret.
The 40M was powered by a 260 hp Manfréd Weiss Z engine. These 14.866-liter gasoline V8s were made very compact to allow for a larger fuel tank by changing the angle from the standard 90° to only 45°. In doing so, the firing of the pistons was different compared to most other V8s, but this directly affected only the engine’s sound and not its performance. The water-cooled cast-iron engine was fairly efficient for the time and only consumed 260 gr/hp of gasoline and 3 kg of oil per 100 km traveled. With a total fuel capacity of 265 liters, this amounted to a range of 165 kilometers and about 5 hours of operation. The engines used 2 Bosch ignition magnetos designed for 4-cylinder engines – one on each cylinder block – and used battery ignition to ensure safe operation. In extremely cold weather (below -20° C), the electric starting equipment would not operate, so a hand crank could also be used to start the engine. More redundancy was also found in the cylinders which each housed two spark plugs. As before, this was to ensure safe operation, but it also improved performance slightly. Unsurprisingly, the narrower angle also caused some problems for the engineers, primarily sharp turns in pipes that increased flow losses. Additionally, some of the larger engine components became difficult to install on the engine because of the confined space.
The engine was coupled to a pneumatic clutch with 6 forward and reverse gears. These speeds were achieved using two sets of planetary gears. Due to these mechanisms, the clutch only needed to be used to shift into first gear while starting and while changing from third into fourth gear while driving. One interesting advantage of this transmission system was that it could shift under load. When tested in 1942, the 40M Turán was found to be better suited to hilly terrain than the Panzerkampfwagen IV Ausf. F1 due to its ability to change gear while climbing hills.
Given that the Turán was a development upon the T-21 that was a development upon the LT vz. 35 itself, it is no surprise that the Turán’s running gear is quite similar to that found on the LT vz. 35. The Turán’s suspension consisted of two bogies connected to one another via a long bar on each side of the vehicle. Each bogie used a 15-sheet leaf spring to support 2 pivot arms that each held a half-bogie. Each half-bogie held 2 pairs of rubber-rimmed road wheels. This amounted to 16 individual road wheels per side of the vehicle. Like its Czech cousins, the Turán also had a pair of wheels, almost the same size as the road wheels, raised off the ground in front of the main suspension assembly to assist in tensioning the track and climbing steep or vertical obstacles. Interestingly, this wheel was rimmed with aluminum rather than rubber and several sources even claim it was sprung. Above and in front of these wheels was the idler sprocket. Most vehicles use a wheel rather than a sprocket for the idler, but the teeth of the sprocket can assist in keeping the treads on the running gear. Behind this sprocket, in a line towards the drive sprocket, were 5 return rollers. Behind the fifth roller and immediately in front of the drive sprocket was a small scoop of sorts that aimed to keep mud from becoming caught in the drive sprocket. All of this running gear was fitted with 106 or 107 individual links to carry the tank. Each link was 42 cm wide and applied a pressure of 0.59 kg per square cm on the ground.
The tank’s armor was made of steel plates riveted to a thinner frame inside the tank. The thickest armor, found on the front of the tank, was 50 mm thick and was made by riveting two thinner plates together. The outer plate was usually 35 mm thick, although some may have been made of paired 25 mm plates. The only parts of the vehicle to have this sort of armor were the nearly vertical plate at the front of the fighting compartment and the turret. The sides and rear of the hull and turret had armor 25 mm thick and the floor and roof of the vehicle had armor only 13 mm thick. By the standards of the time, the Turán was not very well armored, but this was not surprising for an impoverished country lacking proper industrial capacity.
In 1944, all Turán tanks were outfitted with side skirts (referred to as ‘aprons’ in some sources) of spaced armor similar to German Schürzen. These spaced armor skirts were 5 and 8 mm thick pierced steel sheets mounted at 250 mm from the vehicle meant to protect the vehicle from anti-tank rifles, such as the Soviet PTRS and PTRD. They could be easily installed in the field and kits were sent to crews to allow for installation without the need to recall all of the Turáns. There were four pieces to be placed on each side of the hull and two to be placed on each side of the turret. One additional plate was placed on the rear of the turret and two on each side of the cupola. The skirts added 1 tonne to the overall weight of the vehicle.
The Turán’s main gun was a 40 mm L/51 41M tank gun. This gun had a muzzle velocity of 812 m/s and was supplied with 101 rounds of ammunition that could also be used by the Nimród tank destroyer/SPAAG and later models of the Toldi light tank. These were 36M armor-piercing and high explosive rounds as well as the 42M Kerngranate rounds, a rocket-propelled grenade that fit over the end of the barrel like a large rifle grenade. No photos seem to exist showing a Kerngranate used by a Turán, so it is possible that no Turáns actually used it. At a range of 100 m and an angle of 60°, the Turán was able to penetrate 46 mm and this dropped to 30 mm at 1,000 m. This put the performance of the gun as slightly worse than that of a Panzer III Ausf. H. For protection against infantry and unarmored vehicles, the Turán was also armed with two 8 mm 34/40M machine guns with 3,000 rounds of ammunition stored in 30 belts of 100 rounds.
Serial production of the 40M Turán was divided between four of Hungary’s largest industrial powers, Manfréd Weiss, MÁVAG, Ganz Works and Rába (referred to as MVG or Magyar Vagon in some sources), shortly after what was believed to be the finalization of the prototype. These Hungarian metalworks, automotive manufacturers, and rail manufacturers were given an order in September or October of 1941 for 190 vehicles. The order would be increased to 230 vehicles during production delays and was to be divided between the manufacturers in a way that 70 were to be produced by Manfréd Weiss, 70 by Rába, 50 by Ganz, and 40 by MÁVAG. Ganz and MÁVAG were given a later deadline and smaller production targets for the Turán, as they were in the middle of Toldi production. In 1942, an additional 215 Turáns were ordered as part of the Huba III plan, but this order was lowered to just 125 vehicles. This smaller order was further decreased to only the 55 that were produced due to shifting priority towards Turán-based Zrinyi assault guns and Turán IIs, as laid out in the Szabolcz Plan.
In total, 285 were produced. The first delivery to Hungarian soldiers took place in 1942, a full year after production was to have begun and at least four years after initially seeking a medium tank. Sources vary as to the exact number of vehicles delivered and when, but it is usually concluded that somewhat less than 250 were delivered in 1942 and other deliveries in 1943 and 1944 amounted to somewhat less than 50 vehicles. Sources also disagree as to whether any 40M Turáns were still actually being delivered in 1944.
Despite how the development process of the Turán looks in comparison to other countries of the time, it is not actually as poor a performance as it may appear at first glance. Hungary was an impoverished country recovering from a devastating war when it became entangled in a new unwinnable war. With a weak industry crippled by a global economic depression and virtually no tank production experience, several respectable tank designs were modified, tested, and manufactured domestically.
The first 12 serially produced Turáns were used in training at the Armored Forces School in May 1942. Further produced vehicles were sent to the 1st Tank Regiment until Hungary possessed roughly 30 40M Turáns. Over the summer, it was found that the tanks’ transmissions needed further refinement, so every Turán was sent back to the manufacturers to resolve these issues. Units that had been slated for combat in the Eastern Front were given imported vehicles as stand-ins.
In Autumn 1942, the Royal Hungarian Army underwent restructuring and the old tank regiments were reorganized into the 1st Armored Corps. This corps contained the 1st Armored Division formed from the 1st Tank Regiment and had battalions in Esztergom, Rétság, and Jászberény. The 2nd Armored Division was formed from the 3rd Tank Regiment and had battalions in Kecskemét, Cegléd, and Kiskunhalas. These divisions received the majority of the Turán Is, although some were also given to the 1st Cavalry Division in Senta (Zente).
During the Turán I’s lengthy development, it was noted that it would be unsuited to modern combat, so a 75 mm armed version called the 41M Turán II was developed. Due to the lengthy development, these vehicles both began serving in combat at the same time. On April 17th, 1944, Turáns first saw combat in Galicia with the 2nd Armored Division. Perhaps to confuse the Soviets, the Hungarian vehicles had their markings smeared with mud to make them difficult to identify. However, the large national cross painted upon the rear of the hull was left unobscured to allow for identification by friendly aircraft. This group launched a counterattack on a small grouping of Soviet T-34s in a wooded area with several streams rushing from the snowmelt. During this battle, 30 Turán tanks of both the 40 mm 40M and 75 mm 41M types were lost, but only 2 T-34/85s were destroyed and both by 41M Turán IIs. This amounted to a considerable loss as the 30 lost Turáns made up roughly 30% of the tanks being fielded by the 2nd Armored Division. However, the remaining tanks went on to capture the towns of Nadvirna (Nadwórna) and Deliatyn (Deliatin). From early June through mid-July, the 1st Cavalry Division was fighting Soviet defenders along a line from Luninets (Luninec) to Brest and suffered heavy material losses. The following September, the 2nd Armored Division used their Turáns in their capturing of Turda (Torda). In Autumn, the 1st Armored Division’s 124 Turáns were engaged near Arad, Debrecen, and Nyíregyháza and, as with the divisions, many vehicles were lost.
The conclusion of the crews using these vehicles was that the gun was simply too weak to perform any valuable anti-tank role against the T-34/85. While the capabilities of this tank were subpar for the time, the Germans, who were fighting alongside the Hungarians, did note that the Hungarians performed better than was to be expected.
At least one Turán, likely from the 1st Cavalry Division, was captured by Yugoslav partisans in Senta during 1944. Whether this tank was later used by the Partisans and virtually all other details are unknown.
At least one Turán I and one Turán II were brought to Kubinka’s tank proving grounds. The only known Turán II now can be found on display in the Kubinka Tank Museum, but it is unknown if the Turán I still exists hidden in storage. Outside of that unlikely possibility, all other Turán I tanks are believed to have been destroyed in combat or scrap heaps.
41M Turán II Heavy Tank
Before the Turán I entered service, it was clear that the main armament of the tank would need to be improved in order for the vehicle to stand any chance in combat against a modern tank. As such, work was done to replace the feeble 40 mm gun with a larger 75 mm gun. The gun selected was the 75 mm 41M L/25 gun produced by MÁVAG, based upon the Bohler 76.5 mm 18M field gun. This larger gun greatly crowded the already cramped turret and led to a new and larger turret being used on the Turán II. By the standards of virtually every other country involved in World War Two, this vehicle would have been classified as a medium tank at the heaviest, but it was not in Hungary due to the lack of any heavier armor and a tank rating system based on caliber.
44M Zrinyi I and 43M Zrinyi II Assault Guns
The Zrinyi Assault guns were designs similar to the German StuG III . These designs took a widened Turán hull and fixed a low casemate to it in place of a turret and superstructure. This casemate housed a gun too large to easily fit within a turret, but also suffered the disadvantages inherent to lacking a turret. The 44M Zrinyi I was to be armed with a long-barreled 75 mm 43M anti-tank gun developed by MÁVAG, while the 43M Zrinyi II was armed with MÁVAG’s 105 mm 40/43M howitzer. Due to difficulties surrounding the 75 mm gun, only the Zrinyi II was produced, but it was found to be a capable assault gun and led to later Hungarian efforts to place a powerful gun into a turreted vehicle. The name Zrinyi comes from Miklós IV Zrinyi (also called Nikola IV Zrinski), a Hungarian and Croatian military leader and legendary hero who died fighting in the Siege of Szigetvár against the invading Ottoman Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent in 1566.
Had the 40M Turán I entered service in the 1930s, it would likely have proven to be a capable design; however, this was not the case. Time lost negotiating with the non-cooperative Italians and Germans and severe production delays led to a very late introduction of the tank in 1944. Once in service, the age of the design showed, and it developed a poor but honest reputation as the lackluster tank that it was. Despite its flaws, it played an important role in the development of other Hungarian tanks and the Hungarian heavy industry.
|Dimensions (L-W-H)||5.50m x 2.44 m x 2.30 m|
|Total weight, battle-ready||18.2 tonnes|
|Propulsion||260 HP Z-series V8 Manfréd Weiss engine (14.3 HP/tonne)|
|Top road speed||47.2 km/h|
|Max. Road Range||165 km|
|Armament||1x 40 mm 41M L/51 gun, 101 rounds |
2x 8 mm 34/40M machine gun, 3,000 rounds
Magyar Steel by Csaba Becze Hungarian armour during World War 2: The Turán tank and its derivatives described by J. C. M. Probst from Airfix Magazine issue 9, 1976 The Royal Hungarian Army, 1920- 1945 by Leo W.G. Niehorster Tanks of Hitler’s Eastern Allies 1941-45 by Steven J. Zaloga, illustrated by Henry Morshead The Hungarians on the Eastern Front from TAC News http://vesszentrianon.n1.hu/keret.cgi?/kephadit.html Straussler Miklós Tankjai by Németh Károly Československa Obrnena Vozidla 1918-48 by Vladimír Francev & Charles K. Kliment Armor in Pancerne Profile 1 by Janusz Magnuski Harckocsik 1916-tól napjainkig by Bombay, Gyarmati & Turcsányi
6 replies on “40M Turán I”
The Czechs actually had a Skoda 47mm A11 installed in the T-21 prototypes and the Hungarian 40 mm L/51 41M tank gun was a modification of the 40mm 40M anti-tank gun, a modified licensed copy of the German 37mm Pak 36. Also, the Gebauer 8 mm 34/40M machine guns was a Hungarian design with a prototype dating back to 1918 and not a copy of the Czech ZB 30.
Hello Brandon! Yes, the original caliber was 47mm, and it also appears that J.C.M. Probst was mistaken in saying the 34/40M was developed from the ZB30. Both have been corrected. -BSG
Actually the usage of the world Honvéd is incorrect in this article. Honvéd means “defender of the homeland”, or one soldier of the hungarian army. The defending army of the homeland called Honvédség. The official name name until 1945 were Magyar Királyi Honvédség, or Royal Hungarian Army (literally hungarian royal home defending corps, or something like this).
Hello Balázs, thank you for the correction! I have reworded the section explaining the word “Honvéd.” However, I must disagree with your assessment of your English skills, they are far better than my Hungarian. -BSG
I mean word, not world. My english is a bit worse then your hungarian XD.
There was also a prototype called Turán III . With enlarged turret housing the 43M 75 mm long gun. Only prototype destroyed by american bombings of Csepel. (The island in Budapest where the Weiss Manfréd factories were)
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
- Date of birth/Age: Jan 30, 1987 (35)
- Height: 1,77 m
- Position: Left Winger
- Caps/Goals: 100 / 16